- New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com/science/elements/looking-for-life-on-a-flat-earth
- Rollings Stone
- Daily Beast
- ABC
Sample Course notes from Autohoaxology 101:
Believers and Knowers:
The believer vs. knower distinction is the core of the “autohoaxer” concept. Here are a few key points I’d like to clarify in this regard:
- Autohoaxer- one who requires evidence for claims made by pathologically lying media, especially when the claims are extraordinary. This requires investigation, fact-finding, and thorough examination. This is not always conclusive immediately and therefore, the Autohoaxer is often left having to suspend judgment and overreactions to televised news. This stance is in contrast to the:
- Autobeliever– one who assumes what is televised to be true. Their assumption is that the fake news or hoaxes would be exposed by the reporters or journalists. Their error stems from both blind conformity, and the false premise that reporters aren’t part of the production process. So they see reporters are bystanders with cameras, watching a scene unfold, rather than as a reality-television production crew, which is what they essentially are.
About us
The IPS Think Tank Findings:
The explanation for “predictive programming” lies in its utility regarding future or concurrent psyops. Fake news too is explained here as the path to faking history itself. That fabricated history is the Metascript.
Predictive Programming is only half the equation. The game is given away by the realtime engineered coincidences connecting entertainment and fake news events.